Feedback on feedback

 We had a final rehearsal run of the radio programme, and I provided feedback.

My main technical notes were regarding the sound quality, and I recorded what I heard my end and sent it in. These technical notes aside though, we seemed set to go. I also suggested signposting to the website if the show ran over the 30 minute billed time.

Once the first of the three days of radio programming started, I was part of a select group to feedback on the sessions, half an hour after they finished.

This was a great way for me to apply my active listening skills, and my suggestions were taken on board. I think it is very easy for people within an organisation to struggle to make criticisms, even if it is constructive, and I was pleased I could tacitly improve the programme through my ideas. I suggested a further focus on allowing the audience to process music for themselves, particularly when presenters didn't have anything especially insightful to say (and were just being appreciative). This really increased the value of the host interjections, as value was added every time.

I was also able to do some evaluation myself with my parents, who listened to the show. This was another skill I was able to learn and contribute to the company.

I kept my feedback positive by constructive after every session, and I think this is one of my greatest strengths. Like when I peer review my peers' essays, I don't see the point in groundless positive adjectives (or negative ones for that matter). Instead I made sure every point was well focussed and had a direct actionable outcome, even if those listening disagreed and didn't ultimately action the suggestions (ultimately in this case though they did).

In this way I felt very valued as a member of the team who could react well, and I pay a large amount of this in debt to my degree where I essentially imitate a literature critic myself!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improving socials

Trailer: done

Closing one circle and starting another